Evidence-Testimonial Statements and Unavailable Child Witnesses: Why the Cognitive Awareness of the Child-Declarant Should Be the Determinative Factor in Defining an Ongoing Emergency - Commonwealth v. Allshouse

Authors

Gemma R. Ypparila, Suffolk University Law School

First Page

261

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.

Recommended Citation

Ypparila, Gemma R. (2014) "Evidence-Testimonial Statements and Unavailable Child Witnesses: Why the Cognitive Awareness of the Child-Declarant Should Be the Determinative Factor in Defining an Ongoing Emergency - Commonwealth v. Allshouse," Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy: Vol. 19: Iss. 1, Article 13.
Available at: https://dc.suffolk.edu/jtaa-suffolk/vol19/iss1/13