Smoking Guns, Stray Remarks, and Not Much in between: A Critical Analysis of the Federal Circuits' Inconsistent Application of the Direct Evidence Requirement in Mixed-Motive Employment Discrimination Cases

Authors

Elissa R. Hoffman, Suffolk University Law School

First Page

181

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.

Recommended Citation

Hoffman, Elissa R. (2002) "Smoking Guns, Stray Remarks, and Not Much in between: A Critical Analysis of the Federal Circuits' Inconsistent Application of the Direct Evidence Requirement in Mixed-Motive Employment Discrimination Cases," Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy: Vol. 7: Iss. 1, Article 17.
Available at: https://dc.suffolk.edu/jtaa-suffolk/vol7/iss1/17